Syllabus - Clinical Documentation Improvement
Completion requirements
Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI)
Duration: 3 weeks
Credit Equivalent: 1.5 credits
Course Description
This course teaches how better documentation improves patient care, data quality, research, and reporting, especially in low-resource and hybrid (paper + digital) settings.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this course, learners will be able to:
- Explain why high-quality documentation is critical to patient safety
- Identify documentation gaps affecting nursing, case management, and research
- Apply CDI principles in paper-based and electronic systems
- Support accurate coding, reporting, and research using better documentation
- Collaborate across disciplines to improve clinical records
Weekly Topics
Week 1: Foundations of Clinical Documentation
- What is clinical documentation?
- CDI in paper vs electronic systems
- Common documentation problems in LMICs
- Simple documentation audits
- Documentation across the care continuum
Week 2: Clinical Documentation Improvement Across Roles
- Nursing notes and patient monitoring
- Care plans and progress notes
- Case management documentation:
Week 3: CDI for Coding, Reporting and CDS & AI
- How documentation supports ICD coding (conceptual)
- Research data quality and case identification
- Alerts, reports, secondary data use
- Cancer registries and outcome tracking
- Using basic rules (CDS logic) to flag gaps
Assessments
- Discussion (40%)
- CDI improvement proposal (40%)
- Quiz (20%)
Discussion Grading Rubric
| Requirement | Excellent (3) | Proficient (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
| Substance | Fully addresses the prompt; grounds the response in course concepts, data, or specific experience. | Addresses the prompt; uses some concepts or experience but lacks depth or specific examples. | Misses the core question, lacks depth, or relies entirely on unsupported opinion. |
| Engagement | Replies to 2+ peers with substantive questions, counterpoints, or specific additions. | Replies to 1 peer with a substantive response, or 2+ peers with superficial comments. | Fails to reply to peers, or leaves a superficial comment (e.g., "Great post, I agree!"). |
| Clarity & Organization | Writing is clear, logically structured, and easy for the reader to follow. | Writing is mostly clear but has minor organizational issues or distracting errors. | Highly disorganized, difficult to read, or meaning is lost due to frequent errors. |
Last modified: Wednesday, July 1, 2026, 9:22 AM